MEMORANDUM

 

October 24, 1996

 

 

DEANS, DIRECTORS, DEPARTMENT CHAIRS, AND ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICERS

RE: New Policy and Procedure for Funding and Paying Employee Incentive Awards

The purpose of the University's employee Incentive Award Program (IAP) is to reward and motivate the exceptional performance-of staff employees by providing non-base building monetary awards in accordance with University and campus guidelines. This award can be made either to an individual or team. A fundamental precept of this program is that sufficient funding should be made available to ensure that awards are granted equitably to outstanding employees, while conforming to the policy that an employee's salary be charged to the fund source(s) directly benefiting from the performance of his or her University duties. The Office of the President provides funding to support awards for all employees paid from General Funds, and awards for all other employees are charged directly to their regular pay fund sources (hereafter referred to as non-General Funds).

Due to the lack of central funding, this direct charge method has the potential for unfairly disadvantaging non-General Fund employees; therefore, the Office of the President has developed a new policy and procedure to ensure the equitable distribution of incentive awards without regard to individual payroll funding sources. The new methodology, which will add the incentive award component to the employee benefit rate as described below, complies with federal regulations and with collective bargaining provisions for all eligible staff employees and is mandated for all campuses effective July 1, 1996. This new policy was previously announced by Campus Human Resources to all departmental representatives of the Human Resources Management Initiatives Work Group in July, 1996. In addition, UCLA Sponsored Research provided new benefits rate information to the campus in May, 1996 for inclusion in all sponsored projects proposals.

Main Features of the Program

New Procedure for the 1996-97 Fiscal Year

Beginning with the 1996-97 fiscal year, the campus will use a new assessment method implemented through the base Personnel/Payroll System. The direct charge method will no longer be used. This change is being made to ensure the equitable treatment of all employees eligible for the Incentive Award Program. Al1 regular pay of eligible non-academic employees in all fund groups will be assessed on an ongoing basis at the same rate to create a campuswide pool of funds for the Incentive Award Program. The gross amount of the Incentive Award and associated employee benefits costs will be funded from the pool of funds generated by the assessment process.

  1. The assessment. The assessment rate for fiscal year 1996 - 97 has been set at 1.3% of salaries. For the remaining nine months of the 1996-97 fiscal year, the rate per salary dollar will be 1.73% (approximately $1.73/$100 of salary). The first assessment is currently scheduled to begin with October, 1996 earnings. Assessments made against those funds where the campus provides central support of benefits will be reimbursed to the department through the usual employee benefit funding procedure. The following entries will automatically appear as a debit on your ledger at the time of fund assessment, fund by fund as assessed.
  2. IAP Assessment-Benefits Expense (sub 6)

  3. Payment of the Incentive Awards. All Incentive Awards will be paid directly to employees as taxable earnings from department salary accounts.. The cost of employee benefits associated with the awards will be recorded when the awards are made. The following entries will automatically appear as a debit on your ledger at the time of payment of the award, fund by fund as paid.
  4. IAP Award Payment - Salary & Wages (sub 1, 2, 5, or 7)

    and

    IAP Award Payment-Associated Benefits Expense (sub 6)

  5. Funding the Award. The gross amount of the employee Incentive Awards and associated employee benefit costs will be funded from the Incentive Award account. The following entries will automatically appear as a credit on your ledger at the time of payment of the award, fund by fund as paid.

IAP Award Payment-Salaries & Wages (sub 1, 2, 5, or 7)

and

IAP Award Payment-Associated Employee Benefits (sub 6)

Special Requirements

Campuswide, the total annual value of the employee Incentive Awards paid should approximately equal the total annual assessments. This provision applies to the total program and also applies specifically to the federal fund group and to individual collective bargaining units in accordance with labor agreements. At the end of each fiscal year, the campus will analyze the results to ensure that the total awards paid to federally funded employees are generally equal to the total assessments made to federal funds. Similarly, the total awards paid to employees in specific bargaining units generally should be equal to the total assessments charged to funds that paid these employee groups.

Reports of control totals will be produced monthly at the organization level and must be monitored by the appropriate Provost, Dean or Vice Chancellor. By the end of the fiscal year, surpluses or deficits in any fund must be mitigated to the extent possible. Minor surpluses or deficits may be carried forward to the following fiscal year, however, the campus has an obligation to refund the Federal Government for any campus surpluses on federal funds that exceed 15%.

Extramural Project Budgeting for Future Incentive Awards

Consistent with information that was forwarded to the campus in May, 1996 by Sponsored Research, this assessment should be incorporated into all budgets for extramural funding. Departments using actual rates rather than estimated rates in proposal preparation should add the assessment to totals in anticipation of these new charges.

Additional Information

The attached question and answer format provides additional detailed information about the program. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact:

Janine Vaughn, Campus Human Resources (janine@chr.ucla.edu) x40839
Martha Hansen, Sponsored Research (mhansen@ocga.ucla.edu) x50609
Linda Lee, Sponsored Research (llee@ocga.ucla.edu) x54032
Fay Woo, Academic Planning and Budget (fwoo@ponet.ucla.edu) x55713
Blakely Pallock, Payroll Office (bpallock@bafnet.ucla.edu) x48715
Maaza Woldemusie, Corp. Accounting (mwoldemu@bafnet.ucla.edu) x48779

Campus Human Resources will provide specific guidelines for granting 1996-97 Incentive Awards by November, 1996. Informational meetings will be scheduled with departmental personnel to provide details regarding criteria for Incentive Awards and to answer questions about the new program in the next few weeks.

 

Sincerely,

 

Ruie Arnett Susan K. Abeles
Interim Assistant Vice Chancellor Assistant Vice Chancellor
Campus Human Resources Finance

Attachment

 

INCENTIVE AWARD PROGRAM GUIDELINES QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

 

Participation and Applicable Salaries:

Q1: Who is covered by the Incentive Award Program (IAP) assessment provisions?

A1: All non-academic employees (career, casual and casual/restricted) are eligible to participate in the IAP program and are therefore covered by the provisions of the assessment plan, except for the following:

As of July 23, 1996, employees covered by the following contracts are not eligible to receive IAP awards and are not covered by the IAP assessment provisions.

UC/Printing Trades Alliance for Printing Trades
UC Berkeley/Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and
Alameda County Building Trades Alliance for Skilled
Crafts Employees.

Employees with contract appointments may be eligible for IAP awards if so specified in their individual employment contracts; however, these awards will not be paid from the IAP assessment fund and therefore, are not covered by the provisions of the IAP assessment plan.

Employees in the Senior Management Group are eligible for the Incentive Award Program; however, these awards will not be paid from the IAP assessment fund and therefore are not covered by the provisions of the IAP assessment plan.

Q2: Will all pay of eligible employees be assessed?

A2: All regular pay of eligible employees will be assessed. Assessments will not be made to the following general pay categories:

Compensatory time paid Time on call
By agreement pay Overtime
Specialty pay Honorarium
UNEX (University Extension) payments Supplemental military pay
Stipends Certification pay
Terminal Vacation pay Non-base pay
Perquisites Severance pay
On-call time

Q3: Are student employees eligible to participate in the IAP?

A3: Yes, student employees are eligible if they hold staff positions. Student employees may not be excluded because of their student status if otherwise qualified for the program.

Q4: Are non-career, non-academic appointees eligible for the IAP?

A4: Yes. Non-career, non-academic appointees are eligible except as noted in A1.

Rate of Assessment:

Q5: Will the assessment rate for the General Fund differ from rates applicable to other funds?

A5: No. The same rate will be assessed to all funds. The rate may differ from year-to-year, but will be the same for all funds in any given year.

Q6: The assessment rate of approximately 1.3% per year will generate a pool of funding that is higher than the campus has spent in the past. Why is the rate 1.3%?

A6: The 1.3% rate is established by the level of funding provided for General Fund employees. By assessing all fund sources the same rate, it will ensure equal treatment of eligible employees regardless of their funding sources. The rate is also calculated to cover the costs of the directly related employee benefit charges.

Recording the Transaction:

Q7: Will new object codes and a standard set of descriptions be established to record the assessment process?

A7: The following codes have been established to record the process. The description refers to the Universitywide Incentive Award Program (IAP).

New Object Codes PPP5302 Description Entry/Use

8947

IAP Assessment - Staff Career

Debit to record the assessment

8948

IAP Assessment - Staff Casual

Debit to record the assessment

1150

IAP Payment

Debit to record the payment

1180

IAP Award Funding

Credit to fund award

8957

IAP Benefit Funding - Staff Career

Credit to fund employee benefits

8958

IAP Benefit Funding - Staff Casual

Credit to fund employee benefits

 

Associated Benefits:

Q8: How will the cost of associated benefits be funded?

A8: The pool of funds created by the assessment process will be used to pay the award to the employee and to pay for any associated benefit costs. When an employee is paid an award, the departmental account will receive reimbursement in the salary sub-account and in the benefits sub-account.

Q9: What employee benefit costs will be associated with the Incentive Awards?

A9: The following employee benefit costs will be associated with the Incentive Award Program:

These benefit costs shall be funded from the Incentive Award liability pool.

Reporting:

Q10: What are the reporting and tracking requirements for assessed and awarded dollars?

A10: Provosts, Deans, and Vice Chancellors will be responsible for monitoring assessments and awards within their organizations. The Personnel/Payroll System will produce monthly reports of assessments and awards by organization which will display balances for each department by collective bargaining unit for the following fund groups:

General Fund (19900-19906)
Registration Fee (20000)
Federal Government (21000-33999)
All Others

 

At the campus level assessed and awarded dollars will be tracked and reported for the following three groups:

Employees paid by federal funds
Employees covered by collective bargaining agreements
Total campus

All reports will be produced within the Personnel/Payroll System.

Other Questions and Comments:

Q11: Will the assessment procedure affect local award programs?

A11: The assessment procedures only apply to the IAP. Any other award program will not be funded by the basic IAP assessment.

Q12: Will units whose budget depends on income lose flexibility in managing the incentive program?

A12: Income generating units should not lose any flexibility if the IAP requirements are included in their annual plan.

Q13: Won't managers be inclined to ensure the awards given equal the department's funding contribution?

A13: This will be beneficial for departments that have previously ignored the program despite the existence of deserving employees. Departments should conduct appropriate training and institute review procedures to encourage payment of awards to deserving employees only.


 

UCLA Procedures Table of Contents